<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Joker Is More Popular Than Everybody but Satan</title>
	<link>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Vintage Electric Guitar</title>
		<link>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/#comment-4096</link>
		<author>Vintage Electric Guitar</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/#comment-4096</guid>
					<description>There are some key criteria here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some key criteria here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase Tremaine</title>
		<link>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/#comment-4099</link>
		<author>Chase Tremaine</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/#comment-4099</guid>
					<description>I actually have been keeping up with the inflation list at Box Office Mojo. It's really interesting. I was surprised at how much money the top film, Gone with the Wind, would have made in today's money. It's crazy. I also find it nuts that The Dark Knight got pushed down to the 40's when it is in 3rd place without inflation (or is it 3nd now?). I wish movies still costed a quarter to go see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have been keeping up with the inflation list at Box Office Mojo. It&#8217;s really interesting. I was surprised at how much money the top film, Gone with the Wind, would have made in today&#8217;s money. It&#8217;s crazy. I also find it nuts that The Dark Knight got pushed down to the 40&#8217;s when it is in 3rd place without inflation (or is it 3nd now?). I wish movies still costed a quarter to go see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Czubak</title>
		<link>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/#comment-4491</link>
		<author>Alex Czubak</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.allmovie.com/2008/08/13/the-joker-is-more-popular-than-everybody-but-satan/#comment-4491</guid>
					<description>Here's the thing:

I think Titanic would have made the 600 million in today's market, but that's it.  It wouldn't have made more than that because the state of things was different 10 years ago.  At that time, it was the riskiest endeavor because nobody was making 3-hour entertainment films.  I want to leave my opinion of Titanic out of this as this will skew things too much.  From an objective viewpoint, there are far riskier films making money in the market now, especially The Dark Knight.  The fact that a film as dark as that one can be the second-highest domestic gross of any film says a lot about what people expect nowadays.  The Dark Knight would have been passed over 10 years ago as overindulgent, an adjective that would have fit for Titanic in today's market.  If one is to look at just the numbers, then Seibert's assessment in his first two sentences are accurate.  However, factoring in the timing of each film and the current tastes of the era, this would probably not be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing:</p>
<p>I think Titanic would have made the 600 million in today&#8217;s market, but that&#8217;s it.  It wouldn&#8217;t have made more than that because the state of things was different 10 years ago.  At that time, it was the riskiest endeavor because nobody was making 3-hour entertainment films.  I want to leave my opinion of Titanic out of this as this will skew things too much.  From an objective viewpoint, there are far riskier films making money in the market now, especially The Dark Knight.  The fact that a film as dark as that one can be the second-highest domestic gross of any film says a lot about what people expect nowadays.  The Dark Knight would have been passed over 10 years ago as overindulgent, an adjective that would have fit for Titanic in today&#8217;s market.  If one is to look at just the numbers, then Seibert&#8217;s assessment in his first two sentences are accurate.  However, factoring in the timing of each film and the current tastes of the era, this would probably not be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
